I would hope if someone attacked the reputations of Kara-ho, or called Prof. Chow, or my friend Sam Kuoha liars, that you would take offense and respond. If someone wants to argue about dates 50-60 years ago, that's fine. But the founder of my system has been called a liar. The history of our system's beginning and creation has been called a lie, which basically infers that all 5 founders are liars. And no documentation or reliable sources have been quoted to back up the accusations. Accusations have been made about me saying certain things all over the net. So when I ask for proof of where and when I supposedly made these statements or comments, I'm told the poster is too busy to get the proof. But yet he has time to post more accusations. The strength and credibility of any debate is in the quality of the sources. If someone in a serious discussion or debate used as his source "some say", he would be laughed off the podium. I'm not aware of the guidelines that your moderator staff use. Myself, being a moderator/admin on 3 other forums, use one common rule more then any others, "the poster can attack the argument, not the person making it". So yes, if the moderation policies of this forum say that I cannot respond to the accusations made against my system, founders, and self, then please delete my membership.