Hey! Stop copying me! Besides, you do bring up a good point about 'T3H 5Tr33T' TM. What about gangs of rabid neds with chains and used needles?
the ONLY legitimate way to test this is to dress them both in shorts, cover them with baby oil and have them roll around on the floor together in a cage.
I'm thinking there would have to be 3 rounds, to make it fair: 1 on land, 1 in the sea, and 1 airborne. The airborne round would be last for obvious reasons.
http://www.martialartsplanet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33011 Nah, look at #6 Is the cage underwater?
and what kind of bear and wjat kind of squid? a koala versus a piece of calamari, or a large polar bear or three versus a giant squid?!?
I'd say the bear - epecially this little critter: http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/B/bo_selecta/bo_bear_1024.jpg
I have to say I'm edging towards the squid, due to overall physical advantage - but there is one major spanner in the works: Given the '3 rounds' - Obviously, the bear has a massive advantage on land, while the squid has an advantage in the water. But the bear can actually swim. If the bear can avoid the KO for the duration of the water round, he will rule on land and either get a KO or win on points.
Are the squid and the bear matched for mass/size? This way it's decided by fighting skill rather than pure bulk.
That's assuming that the squid doesn't drag the bear down to the darkest depths and drown poor old paddington...... Oh and is either one wearing gloves?????
