I just read a blog article about a boy who was the son of a known/suspected terrorist, who went searching for his father who was in hiding with other suspected/known terrorists, who ended up finding some people his father was associated with right around the time a drone strike was coordinated on the people he found himself with. Did you actually read the article, or did you just see a headline that stated what you want to believe? This sounds as much as an "unfortunate circumstance" as it can get.
Jorvik, drop the personal attacks. Just because someone disagrees with you, it doesn't make them a Nazi.
If it's not Contrails it's the CIA... if it's not the CIA it's the Knights Templar... if it's not the Knights Templar is the black helicopters... if it's not the black helicopters... it's the indoctrination camps... if it's not the indoctrination camps... it's the Clinton body count if it's not the Clinton body count... it's the Eurabians if it's not the Eurabians... it's the water flouridation... if it's not the water flouridation... it's the Freemasonry... if it's not the Freemasonry it's the Illuminati.... have a go Jarvik... hahahahaha... I'm sure you can fill out that list with your beliefs. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo"]What A Maroon! - YouTube[/ame] The problem with you lot is because you give such credence to absolute nutbar nonsense actual issues of importance are all that much easier to get overlooked or have them linked with your nutty tinfoil hat camp. You lot do the biggest disservice to having people maintain and awareness of important issues.
Well perhaps you could be a little bit more even handed over this, every time I say something that holyditch can't refute or doesn't agree with he insults me.as far as I am concerned if he does that then I'll go right back at him...and FYI I do think he is a nazi, I just think that he is too stupid to know what a Nazi is..the merger of State and corporate finance is Fascism as per Mussolilini which MR.H seems to endorse, also he advocates the repression of free speech which to me is also the sign of a Nazi ( free speech means just that, you can say anything that you want and if people don't like it tough ) and of course it is a two edged sword, today you may not be able to say anything racist or homophobic , tomorrow it may be that you cannot say anything promoting homosexuality or race equality ..just look at the history books, all this has happened before..........history doesn't repeat itself but very often it rhymes
That's quite far enough. I get that your dander is up. And, while I haven't read this whole thread, it's safe to say it's not one-sided. But that's two personal attacks for the price of one. Simmer down a few degrees, yeah? EDIT: That goes for all of us.
Uh... no it doesn't. You need to go back and read and actually understand Schenck v. United States (1919) and Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) before you start flapping your gums about what is free speech.
Hey, at least I know what a 'two-edged sword' actually is, because it aint like that thing you done wrote in that post. The rhetorical device you were looking for is 'slippery slope'. The difference between you and I - you look at history books. I read them. I think I'd find your attacks more damaging if your posts weren't quite so incoherent. It's like being called a Nazi by a WoW troll.