I guess you can see where I'm coming from then and why I didn't want to type out a book long summary of the evidence on an internet forum, lol....
Fair enough. But if you really want to argue your point, your going to have to elaborate. I know nothing about Odin. Or the supposed eye...
who died for Paul bunyan? And who ever believed him to be anything but non-fiction anyway. Fair enough .But I didn't say anything about...
Luke was a historian and in the book of Luke he mentions at the beginning that he gathered his information from eyewitnesses. When you get...
And Like I said you are being too vague.
I don't need to go back and read anything. I can go by memory for now. First of all the oldest manuscripts of the NT scripture were written...
And I'm referring to the oldest manuscripts.
When it was written down, many of the eyewitnesses were still alive.
Because I would be doing entirely too much typing. All I ask is he quote a small part of what he read.
Fair enough. But based on your knowledge is eye witness testimony always unreliable no matter what, or does it depend on the circumstances?
You aren't quoting the book like I asked. If you are going to argue against a book at least quote what in the book you thought was wrong instead...
Your going to have to be more specific in order for me to respond. Your going to have to quote the evidence in the book and tell me why it's...
Thank you so much. That was such a big help. You are a life saver.
ok I fixed it. Why don't you buy the book. Read the first chapter , bout 17 pages. And tell me why u think it is flawed? It will cost...
You know what. I'm just going to drop out of the debate, unless Philosoraptor is willing to buy the book. If he is willing to buy the book, or...
Separate names with a comma.
