Would you train such a person?

Discussion in 'General Martial Arts Discussion' started by Kevin W Collins, May 20, 2015.

  1. Kevin W Collins

    Kevin W Collins Valued Member

    If someone comes to you for training and that person says they have PTSD and Bipolar and they prove they want to learn a martial art for personal enlightenment and development as well as learning and practicing self-discipline and self-respect and to achieve a better and deeper sense of self-confidence.

    How about a person who has a multiple personality disorder who doesn't know why she wants to learn or a bad case of schizophrenia that pretty much keeps them institutionalized more than not but wants to learn for the wrong reasons.

    Would you train such a person(s)? Why or why not?

    If so, what would you require of the individual(s) before you began training them?

    If not, please give a best case scenario and a worst case scenario of why you would not train such individuals?
     
  2. Prizewriter

    Prizewriter Moved on

    I wouldn't. I think they'd get more out of a good yoga class tbh.
     
  3. holyheadjch

    holyheadjch Valued Member

    I'd train anyone who was willing, capable and responsible in class.

    Assuming that mentally ill people are violent is wrong and highly offensive.
     
  4. Prizewriter

    Prizewriter Moved on

    Well I sure wasn't. I think for someone looking for enlightenment and development, they will get more out of a good yoga class than any martial arts class. Just my opinion.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2015
  5. holyheadjch

    holyheadjch Valued Member

    I wasn't reading into your reply, but the question is clearly loaded in that direction.
     
  6. Kevin W Collins

    Kevin W Collins Valued Member

    I was asking honestly...I didnt mean for the question to be loaded to receive a prescribed response.

    Sorry if my wording isn't proper english that an english teacher would pass as excellent. I'm a redneck to the core and proud of it.

    please forgive me for being satisfied with my own grammar and vocab.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2015
  7. Kevin W Collins

    Kevin W Collins Valued Member

    can you elaborate more on this please?
     
  8. SWC Sifu Ben

    SWC Sifu Ben I am the law

    If they want to do it, are able to do it, and are able to do it safely with others there's no reason not to.

    I trained a guy who has schizophrenic tendencies but wasn't full on schizophrenic. He said it was due to heavy LSD use but that he had trained tai chi before. He ended up not taking direction and correction well no matter how I modified my approach (more on that later). Early on I realized that what he really wanted was not training but connection with other people, an opportunity to exercise agency, and to be seen as an authority. He wanted the connectedness that his mental discontinuity (for lack of a more apt term) was keeping him from.

    The biggest impediment to his learning was his disordered thinking. It made it difficult for him to grasp simple concepts without running off on a wild and unrelated mental tangent and almost impossible to him to put in the reps required to instill muscle memory.

    Had that not been an impediment for him he was an otherwise pleasant guy and safe training partner who I would have been happy to continue teaching. Ultimately he realized he wasn't getting what he wanted and/or needed here and he left. Hopefully he is doing better now.

    I've trained two people with PTSD and it's less of an issue as they become desensitized to training. I saw it have some very positive effects on their mental function.

    Bipolar is a tricky animal it can be difficult for them to keep motivated and effective due to the depressive periods and then they go full bore during the manic phases and you sometimes have to reign them in. I've known a few people with this and as long as you can keep them engaged and you can support them through the low phases it CAN be done but it's not easy.
     
  9. Kevin W Collins

    Kevin W Collins Valued Member

    Your whole post is an awesome read...I look forward to hearing more ;)
     
  10. SWC Sifu Ben

    SWC Sifu Ben I am the law

    I meant in the post but if you'd like an example of the disordered thinking...
    Once I was talking about angling off and allowing space to accommodate and he started going off about how you can't obstruct people because [unintelligible leap between concepts]. He then started doing entirely unrelated movements and I could see him visually imagining rivers and waterfalls and such.

    This happened a few times.

    Once he started relating a concept to sword work so I showed him how it applied to sword techniques and then he got off on another tangent about wrestling somehow.

    It didn't seem to matter whether I followed with his leaps in logic and subject matter or stopped them. Pattern interrupts (stopping him from visualizing and thereby keeping him mentally present) tended to work but only briefly. I admit I was out of my depth with how to constructively channel the already present behaviours or successfully impede them. I had much more success with people with PTSD and Bipolar.
     
  11. Southpaw535

    Southpaw535 Well-Known Member Moderator Supporter

    Yes to the first, no to the second.

    PTSD example yes because I imagine it would actually help them deal with it and it's an illness I have a big interest in. The schizophrenic learning for the wrong reasons no, but because you said they wanted to learn for the wrong reasons. That's a no anyway, the mental illness is unimportant.

    Although being frankly honest I wouldn't want to teach someone who was at the extreme of being in and out of care. Not because I have fears of them being dangerous (although in the styles I do if they were unable to work with a partner then it'd be a no) but because of have no idea how to best go about teaching them.

    Generally speaking though my point is mental illness is irrelevant. Same questions as with normal students: can they be safe, can they be trusted, why are they learning, and am I confident I can adequately provide the service they're paying for? Should be the only things instructors care about in my opinion.
     
  12. qazaqwe

    qazaqwe Valued Member

    It should really fall under one question and one question alone, do you think the person seeking your instruction is going to use what you teach them to harm others beyond either regulated competition or self defense? If you honestly believe the answer is yes, refuse them as a student.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2015
  13. Kevin W Collins

    Kevin W Collins Valued Member

    It seems to be noted that I should point out that schizophrenia is a general term and that there are more specific types such as schizo-effective disorder and paranoid schizophrenia.

    While both are schizophrenia, they are 2 total different diagnosis'.
     
  14. Fish Of Doom

    Fish Of Doom Will : Mind : Motion Supporter

    i'm mostly with southpaw. if i knew i could do something positive for them without mucking up catastrophically, then i'd be all in favour of teaching them, but without knowing the particulars of each ailment AND more importantly of the person who has it (because i would deal with the person, not the ailment), i cannot be entirely sure that i would be able to make a positive contribution to their mental and physical welfare, so i would have to talk it over with the person in question and decide along with them if my hypothetical class would be a beneficial environment for them.
     
  15. Kevin W Collins

    Kevin W Collins Valued Member

    Very well said
     
  16. aaradia

    aaradia Choy Li Fut and Yang Tai Chi Chuan Student Moderator Supporter

    If a person is ill enough to be institutionalized, then (if I was an instructor of ANYTHING) I would check with the Dr's in that institution. If they thought what I had to teach was beneficial, great!

    If they didn't , they wouldn't allow me to teach the person anyways, so it really wouldn't be an issue.

    If the Dr's have no problem with it, far be it from me to pretend I am a medical professional and disagree with them. Nor to make decisions on whom I teach based on an illness.
     
  17. blindside

    blindside Valued Member

    One of my friends started training kali and he credits it with giving him the focus and outlet that he needed to deal with his PTSD.
     
  18. Kevin W Collins

    Kevin W Collins Valued Member

    This is one of the many approaches to training or not training such individuals.

    thank you Aaradia
     
  19. philosoraptor

    philosoraptor carnivore in a top hat Supporter

    I'm still relatively inexperienced at martial arts and, in general, have only been asked to demonstrate specific techniques with my partners. I will break down the technique into its constituent parts and, for as long as we are allowed to practice techniques, will do so and verbally aid as best I can. Of course, with the knowledge that sometimes just running through it a few times is the best teacher. So anyway, several times have been paired with mentally different people. Am probably mentally different myself! I'll help them practice the technique as best I can, then, if free sparring with them, will suggest we practice the technique more. So far, so good?
     
  20. YouKnowWho

    YouKnowWho Valued Member

    I try to stay away from people with such "abstract" attitude. The reason is simple. I can't pretend that I care about "personal enlightenment".

    I only teach those who are willing to

    - compete in tournament (for himself), and
    - pass on MA knowledge to the future generation (for others).
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2015

Share This Page