Star Wars epsiode 7

Discussion in 'Off Topic Area' started by Travess, Nov 28, 2014.

  1. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    Wow.

    You could have read 30 real books for grown-ups in that time.

    :p
     
  2. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    Saw the Episode I trashing.

    1000 times more entertaining than the film, and surprisingly funny and rather insightful look into Hollywood writing structure.

    Cheers for mentioning it! :beer:

    (why doesn't this forum have a "cheers" emoticon? :mad: )
     
  3. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    You mean Return of the Jedi?
     
  4. CrowZer0

    CrowZer0 Assume formlessness.

    I thought watching Yoda in action vs Count Dooku was pretty cool!
     
  5. aikiMac

    aikiMac aikido + boxing = very good Moderator Supporter

    I thought it mildly cool, as was Mace Windu versus Palpatine, but only because of who the combatants were. The choreography/scripting was unfortunately of low caliber. All the money in "Star Wars" goes into computer effects instead of script writing, acting lessons, and choreography. (sigh)

    Seriously, what with all the hype about what a powerful Jedi Yoda is, blah blah blah he's the most feared and powerful Jedi, I expected a lot more out of him here and when he faced off with Palpatine later in the story line. Like with the pillar tumbling down -- why not push it away harmlessly? Or better yet, why not slide the fallen Jedi out of its path? And why did Yoda need two hands and total concentration to move the pillar when Dooku did it with one hand while dueling? And why didn't Dooku attack Yoda when Yoda was unarmed and concentrating on the pillar? In "Empire" Darth Vader grabbed things and threw them at Luke when they fought. Why couldn't Yoda do the same in this fight with Dooku? Or how about some Force shoves by the mightiest Jedi in the universe? :(
     
  6. Southpaw535

    Southpaw535 Well-Known Member Moderator Supporter

    Because the Sith are better
     
  7. Fish Of Doom

    Fish Of Doom Will : Mind : Motion Supporter

    choreography? liam neeson, hayden christensen, ray park and ewan mcgregor all did more hardcore training for the prequel trilogy than many serious martial artists will do in their life :p

    [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3rtSwXThXU"]Lightsaber training in Star Wars - YouTube[/ame]

    [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk1qghsNiok"]Sword-Fighting in Star Wars Ep. I - YouTube[/ame]
     
  8. Pretty In Pink

    Pretty In Pink Moved on MAP 2017 Gold Award

    ".....Money spent...... instead of on Choreography....."

    Seriously? Did you think that the Original three films were very well choreographed fight scenes?
     
  9. Fish Of Doom

    Fish Of Doom Will : Mind : Motion Supporter

    also what chadderz said. it's like on another forum i saw people complaining about the space magic in interstellar while praising 2001's :p
     
  10. Fish Of Doom

    Fish Of Doom Will : Mind : Motion Supporter

    also, [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PAOPveZtoE"]Star Wars It's All For Real: The Stunts Of Episode III Featurette Part 2 - YouTube[/ame]
     
  11. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    Honestly, everyone talking about Star Wars fight choreography should watch the Episode I review Mr. Smith mentioned. Then you will be in no doubt as to why the original trilogy had far superior fight scenes, regardless of budget, choreography or CGI.
     
  12. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    Space magic?

    Is there an extended version of 2001 I don't know about?
     
  13. Fish Of Doom

    Fish Of Doom Will : Mind : Motion Supporter

    it's a reference to arthur c clarke's "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".
     
  14. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

  15. Fish Of Doom

    Fish Of Doom Will : Mind : Motion Supporter

    that article does not read as "interstellar is not very grounded in science" (in fact it directly states the opposite at one point). it reads as "there are things in interstellar which are not feasible". which is, you know, kind of the point of science fiction ;). hell, it's a movie, not a textbook :p; this is like wanting your team to win a world championship and then when they win a very close final match, complaining that they didn't dominate :p

    some of the points he raises (notably, time dilation) have actually been talked about by kip thorne, the scientific advisor for the movie, who worked one-on-one with nolan to hammer out the details and actually had to veto several things due to extreme scientific inaccuracy.
     
  16. Mushroom

    Mushroom De-powered to come back better than before.

    Queen Black Swan Madeline said that in Thor!
     
  17. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    Must'a been where that Arthur bloke nicked it from.
     
  18. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    Sure, I don't care about infeasibility in fiction, that's fine. I thought when you said the "space magic" thing that people were comparing the feasibility of the two films. From what I've read about interstellar, it's not as feasible as 2001, so that sounds like fair comment. That's all.

    The feasibility of 2001 is part of its appeal to many people.
     
  19. Fish Of Doom

    Fish Of Doom Will : Mind : Motion Supporter

    well, that's the thing, they were talking about the feasibility of the unfeasible things. been a while since i've seen the movie itself, but going by the novels? space mothertrucking magic ahoy (and HOW). did the 2001 movie have the starchild blowing up the nuke thing?
     
  20. David Harrison

    David Harrison MAPper without portfolio

    It's been a while since I saw the film, and a lot longer since I read the book...

    I don't remember anything about nukes though...
     

Share This Page