View Full Version : Discussion: Weight training vs. Body-weight training for martial artists
Patrick Smith
08-Dec-2009, 09:27 PM
I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I've searched quite a few times and browsed the pages but haven't found what I'm looking for.
Either way, I think a discussion thread that deals with weight training vs. body-weight training would be very beneficial to those who aren't well educated in this subject (like myself :D).
This are the questions:
why should martial artists lift weights (pros and cons)
why should martial artists primarily do body-weight exercises? (pros and cons)
Thanks,
Patrick
YouKnowWho
08-Dec-2009, 09:31 PM
MA contains skill and ability. Skill is something you learn in school (school work). Ability is something you develop at home (home work). It's better to devote your time in "equipment training - enhance MA skill" than in "weight training - build big muscle".
Here are 2 examples of "equipment training" (not weight training).
http://johnswang.com/sc15.wmv
http://johnswang.com/sc20.wmv
Patrick Smith
08-Dec-2009, 09:36 PM
But as far as I know, weight training doesn't necessarily build large muscles. It can, but it doesn't necessarily.
Haha, thanks for posting those examples of equipment training. I was going to ask you what you meant.
I see what you mean, but he's still using weight for developing strength. Plus, doing martial art techniques with added weight (first vid) is not necessarily safe. It seems to me that the guy in the first vid could develop the same kind of explosive strength using weights without doing it in such an uncontrolled and hazardous manner.
FWIW
YouKnowWho
08-Dec-2009, 09:45 PM
It depends on whether you are trying to build "whole body" or just "muscle group". Bench press may help your punching power in striking but may not help you twisting power in throwing.
For example, the Kelly Bell can help you to develop your better wrist strength than the regular dumb bell because the special design of the KB weight distributation (better equipment than DB). But the square bag that filled with steel balls can build both your wrist and finger strength at the same time (better equipment than KB).
Plus, doing martial art techniques with added weight (first vid) is not necessarily safe.
This is why the amount of the weight to use in the initial training stage is important. Fast pull and fast release of a weight pulley may tear your muscle apart, but it can help you to develop some "explosive power". I agree that there are certain risk involved in this kind of training (if you start with too much weight).
Patrick Smith
08-Dec-2009, 09:55 PM
Sorry, updated my post before I saw yours (again) :rolleyes:
Explosive power can also be learned via safer methods. For example, in the first vid, the martial artist seems to be primarily working the hip flexors, the quads, and the abs (I'm likely wrong about this, I don't know all the muscles in this area). In this case, I think he could do lying or hanging leg raises (which can be done semi-explosively or fully explosively) to get the same effect without such risk.
FWIW
CDKungFu
08-Dec-2009, 10:02 PM
You'll never go far wrong in bodyweight training. If you can't deal with your own bodyweight then you won't be able to deal with an opponent's weight easily. It's better to have that core basic strength, before this turns into a techniques and skill argument...
YouKnowWho
08-Dec-2009, 10:03 PM
IMO, the main purpose of the "equipment training" is not trying to develop muscle but to develop certain ability that we don't have when we were born, and also we cannot obtain it through our daily activity. For example, if you dig a hole and put a Bowling ball in it. You use your foot to 'scoop" that Bowling ball out of the hole daily. Through this kind training, you may not develop any noticeable muscle, but you may develop the "scooping" ability that most people don't have which is quite useful in the throwing arts.
Patrick Smith
08-Dec-2009, 10:07 PM
Yes, let's keep this to the main point: should martial artists use bodyweight or weight training for strength?
YouKnowWho
08-Dec-2009, 10:12 PM
You should be able to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. The Bowling ball example may be a bit too extream but in gerenal, the weight is the same. It's up to "how you are going to handle it".
Kuma
09-Dec-2009, 02:39 AM
They should use both, naturally. Get the best of both worlds.
Take some of my recent workouts. For a press workout, I did several sets of the military press, dips, and pull-ups. For a squat workout, I did several sets of the back squat, leg press, and glute ham raises.
You're only hurting yourself if you avoid one or the other.
liero
09-Dec-2009, 02:40 AM
The purpose of any resistence training, weights or bodyweight is to improve the fundamental fitness and strength of the person training in the martial art with the intent for that to carry over to an improvement in technique/fighting ability of the practitioner.
When you are stronger you are faster. Studies show that individuals who complete a strength training program show increases in speed.
Being stronger can also help you reduce risk of injury etc, etc, etc.
I think the benefits of using a strength routine as a part of martial arts training are pretty apparent to anyone.
So, which one should we use, Weights or our own bodies?
Either type of exercise modality can give you substantial gains, assuming you train the right way...
Examples
negative of weight training- Training like a body builder in high reps (12+) and doing isolated muscle excercises like bicep curls will not increase functional strength which will be unlikely to increase performance.
positive of weight training- Training compound exercises (e.g. Deadlifts) with a moderate amount of reps and plenty of rest to prevent injuries can increase core strength, power generation ability and functional strength, the fighter who incorporates this will probobly see functional improvement for the martial arts.
negative view of bodyweight training- A fighter who can perform 200 slow bodyweight squats has great strenght endurance. But this person needs to develop the ability to use their strength explosively...they may be able to do 500 kicks from their endurance training, but each of those kicks has to count.
Positive view of bodyweight training- A fighter who regularly completes conditioning workouts using exercises such as burpees, push ups, pull ups and who also incorporates strength building and explosive exercises including, plyometric pushups, one armed pull ups, and jumping squats. This fighter will develop tremendous explosive power. This method would likely develop endurance more than many weight training plans.
My theory is a combination is necessary. For a novice athlete bodyweight training would be the easiest to lean, and least likely to cause injury.
For reasons of personal preference, plateauing in gains or just access to a gym- Using free weights will also give benefits if the lifts are performed correctly. Machine weights are usually isolation exercises which dont give gains in core stability, muscular controll and coordination, all of which are attributes a martial artist needs to have
just one thing
Weight training if machine or otherwise shouldnt supplement good martial arts training. just because you can bench more, or do more pullups, doesnt mean your better at sparring. Your main goal should be skill development, with the other training secondary and seperate, with enough recovery time in between each session for maximum performance in whatever your trying to do...
Kuma
09-Dec-2009, 02:49 AM
Good post liero.
Small rant: It's a pet peeve of mine, but I absolutely hate the term "functional strength." Is there really anything such as dysfunctional strength? I personally laugh at the goofs balancing one legged on a Bosu ball as they curl a resistance band with one arm and press a kettlebell at the same time, yet can barely deadlift 300 pounds.
Ad McG
09-Dec-2009, 08:41 AM
My answer to this is always a question: why only use one or the other exclusively? The best by far is to use a mix of both. Weights are better for maximal strength/power development and for movements that are difficult to achieve without external resistance so you can work towards becoming more balanced. Bodyweight stuff is generally easier on the joints and gives you more control and skill at moving your own body. This is why MMAers mostly use both. Contrary to old-school opinion, weight training pretty much only has benefits when it comes to martial arts training and bodyweight movements are limited when it comes to strength development.
Frodocious
09-Dec-2009, 11:46 AM
I agree with Ad McG and Leiro, a mix of weights and bodyweight is the best way to train.
With weight training it is much easier to monitor progress and increase the weight than it is with bodyweight exercises. Bodyweight strength work often relies on more difficult progressions of exercises such as the planche, and it can take time to build from one progression to the next, with progress being measured in the length of time you can hold the position rather than the weight being lifted.
When talking about bodyweight training most people think of it as a conditioning element, i.e. 500 pushups etc, but fail to realise that, when appropriately trained, it can actually contribute to excellent strengh gains - just look at gymnasts.
Patrick Smith
09-Dec-2009, 12:12 PM
Sweet, this is awesome. :)
How about Christopher Sommers book? He trains athletes to develop muscles that contract very quickly for gymnastics so wouldn't his type of training be very beneficial to martial artists?
Here's an article I just read: http://www.dragondoor.com/articler/mode3/229
What do you think? Isn't gymnastic training similar enough to martial arts training that a martial artist could benefit very much from doing Sommers routine?
(the link to his book and description: http://www.gymnasticbodies.com/store/library/building-the-gymnastic-body.html)
Frodocious
09-Dec-2009, 12:17 PM
See this thread:
http://www.martialartsplanet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84178
I mix weight training and bodyweight training and find they both help my martial arts training.
Patrick Smith
09-Dec-2009, 09:57 PM
Thanks, Frodocious. Very insightful.
Here's the thing, My goal is to become as adept as I can in both martial arts and gymnastics, and quite frankly, right now, gymnastics kind of strength training (mixed with my martial arts specific training) is looking very promising. I'm going to research it more, though, and see what I can find. I'm also going to go through the thread you linked to again. I often miss whole sections of threads...
Thanks!
Stuart H
17-Dec-2009, 11:46 AM
The original question is a false dichotomy. Look at professional athletes in MMA, Olympic wrestling, judo, football, rugby, boxing... it's a combination of the two.
Patrick Smith
22-Dec-2009, 03:33 PM
Thanks, Stuart. From what I've been reading a lot of lately, I think you're right about that.
Talyn
07-Feb-2010, 11:59 AM
If doing a handstand pushup is a bodyweight workout, does strapping on a 10kg vest or some ankle weights turn it into a weight workout? If so, the fine line between bodyweight and weight seems rather arbitrary.
Patrick Smith
10-Feb-2010, 02:17 AM
If doing a handstand pushup is a bodyweight workout, does strapping on a 10kg vest or some ankle weights turn it into a weight workout? If so, the fine line between bodyweight and weight seems rather arbitrary.
The terms 'weight training' and 'a weight workout' usually bring iron weights to mind, however, body weight exercises use weight too, just your body's weight instead of an external weight. Gymnasts prove that using body weight exercises properly can develop incredible strength but so do power lifters and strongmen. Well, what's the difference?
From what I've learned at the BtGB forum, it's rare to find an iron weight lifter who can do what a gymnasts can. Many new members of the forum state that they were shocked to discover that they could not do even a single proper front lever. It would appear that many weight lifters can not do what gymnasts do, but many gymnasts can do what weight lifters do.
I dunno, I'm to sleepy to think straight.
By the way, BtGB refers to Coach Sommer's book and website, Building the Gymnastic Body (http://www.gymnasticbodies.com/)
(too sleepy to expand on this further at the moment :rolleyes: I will post back)
gj5940
15-Feb-2010, 07:51 PM
You should mix it up with both weights and bodyweight training!
once a bodyweight exercise has become do-able ie you can get 20 reps of a push up look to decrease the leverage IE raise your feet higher and higher or go to attempting dips on rings they're good fun once you have gotten past the shaking like a leaf in a storm!
You could use weights to bulk up for a cycle of six weeks or so then hammer it on bodyweight training for another cycle and see the strength rocket. It works well for martial arts and you get the best of both worlds!
Kuma
15-Feb-2010, 08:49 PM
An interesting thing to think about:
The smaller you are weight-wise, the easier bodyweight exercises are and the more effort you need to put into weight training to lift appreciable poundages. The heavier you are weight-wise, it's the opposite. Hence why smaller individuals lifting heavy weights and big guys doing great with bodyweight exercises is more impressive than the other way around.
Naim Suleymanoglu clean and jerking 190kg/418 pounds at a BW of 60kg/132 pounds.
YouTube- Naim 190kg Seoul
Jesse Marunde, deceased strongman competitor who at 316 pounds is doing 21 pull-ups in this video and has videos of him doing plyometric pull-ups where he literally launches himself up, claps his hands, then comes back down and repeats.
YouTube- Jesse Marunde 21 Pull-ups
To me, if it was the other way around, neither would be as impressive.
gj5940
16-Feb-2010, 12:04 PM
Thats quite a lift but do you not think that holding your body in an unusual position requires alot of strength and that strength has carry over effects to MA and weight training? Lifting double bodyweight in a lift is impressive regardless of the size of the individual
Kuma
16-Feb-2010, 01:29 PM
They both do, but it's more realistic for a smaller individual to lift double bodyweight than a larger so you can't just go by that number alone. A 150 pound man can easily lift double bodyweight quicker than a 300 pound man can.
Patrick Smith
16-Feb-2010, 01:38 PM
They both do, but it's more realistic for a smaller individual to lift double bodyweight than a larger so you can't just go by that number alone. A 150 pound man can easily lift double bodyweight quicker than a 300 pound man can.
I've read about a student of Coach Sommer who, on his first try, deadlifted over 400 lbs. At the time, he had never done deadlifts previously and he weighed just 130 lbs.
gj5940
16-Feb-2010, 03:32 PM
in relation to what we are talking about the bodyweight strength is ideal for martial arts and has been for centuries, if the person uses both weights and bodyweights they will develop faster than using exclusively one or the other! a 300lb person is going to have a hard time doing anything let alone trying to do a pullup or running up a flight of stairs. although the video of that guy doing pullups is great to see but he is shredded to the bone so all muscle and no excess bodyfat
Knight_Errant
07-Mar-2010, 10:06 AM
What do you think? Isn't gymnastic training similar enough to martial arts training that a martial artist could benefit very much from doing Sommers routine?
I wouldn't have said so, personally. Gymnastics generally focuses on different ways of shifting your own carcass around. With martial arts you have to develop power externally. There are useful crossovers though.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.